Skip to main content

In tunneling and trenching projects, controlling water ingress is essential to maintain structural stability and ensure worker safety. Groundwater can significantly impact excavation activities by causing soil instability and creating hazardous working conditions. To address these challenges, various dewatering methods are employed to manage and control water in the work area. This article explores some of the most commonly used dewatering techniques in underground construction, emphasizing their importance in tunneling and trenching operations.

1. Wellpoints Dewatering System

The wellpoints system is one of the most widely used dewatering methods in trenching and tunneling. It involves the installation of a series of small, closely spaced wells (wellpoints) around the excavation site. A vacuum is applied to these wells to draw groundwater to the surface, effectively lowering the water table in the work area. This method is particularly effective in granular soils and is commonly used in shallow trenching projects.

Advantages:

  • Cost-effective for shallow excavations
  • Quick installation process
  • Highly efficient in loose, granular soils

2. Deep Well Systems

For larger and deeper excavation projects, the deep well system is often preferred. This method involves drilling deeper wells into the ground at strategic locations around the excavation site. Submersible pumps are then installed in the wells to draw groundwater out, lowering the water table. Deep well systems are highly effective for managing large volumes of water in deep tunnels and trenches, particularly in areas with permeable soil layers.

Advantages:

  • Suitable for deep excavation projects
  • Can handle large volumes of water
  • Effective in a variety of soil types, including permeable soils

3. Sump Pumping

Sump pumping is a simple and straightforward method often used in shallow trenching projects where water ingress is not extensive. It involves the use of sumps (small pits) dug at the lowest points in the excavation site. Water that accumulates in the pits is then pumped out using electric or diesel-powered pumps. While sump pumping is less complex than other dewatering methods, it is often used as a supplementary method in combination with wellpoints or deep well systems.

Advantages:

  • Easy and cost-effective to implement
  • Useful for small-scale dewatering operations
  • Can be used alongside other dewatering methods

4. Horizontal Dewatering

Horizontal dewatering involves the use of perforated pipes or well screens installed horizontally below the water table. The water is drawn through these pipes and pumped to the surface. This method is ideal for trenching projects where space constraints make vertical well installation difficult. Horizontal dewatering is particularly effective in sandy soils or areas with a high water table.

Advantages:

  • Efficient for long, narrow excavation sites
  • Ideal for projects with limited space for vertical wells
  • Works well in sandy and permeable soils

5. Jet Ejector Pumps

Jet ejector systems are used when standard pumping methods are insufficient due to low permeability of the soil. The system operates by forcing a high-velocity jet of water into the soil, creating a vacuum that draws groundwater to the surface. This method is effective in cohesive soils like clay, where traditional pumps struggle to remove water. Although more expensive, jet ejector systems are necessary in projects where soil conditions make other dewatering methods impractical.

Advantages:

  • Effective in low-permeability soils like clay
  • Can be used where other methods fail

Conclusion

Effective dewatering is essential in ensuring the safety and stability of tunneling and trenching projects. By selecting the appropriate dewatering method—whether it be wellpoints, deep wells, sump pumping, horizontal dewatering, or jet ejector pumps – construction professionals can manage groundwater effectively and ensure the success of underground projects. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each method allows for better planning and execution, reducing risks and improving project outcomes.